AP Political Analysis 2014

Let’s start party wise: Congress (I): If you ask a regular citizen in AP, “what is the ruling government in your state?”, most probably you might get a blank on their face. Congress has more enemies internally in the party than outside the party. From the present state of affairs, seems more “unlikely” that Congress would retain power in the state in 2014. Most of the aspiring candidates for MLA tickets, if denied, would either dent the chances of their own party candidate or follow the lead to YSR Congress. Not much to say here. YSR Congress: The more the leaders from other parties are joining YSR Congress, the tougher it gets for the candidate selection(s). Every other leader joining the party is with the expectation that they would be given MLA/MP ticket. The denied candidates might as well work against the interest of the party. That said, almost most of the constituencies in AP has at least 15000-20000 hardcore YSR supporters who have benefitted from his schemes and would be loyal to the party. If YSR Congress manages to build the bridge between these votes and the incoming flock of leaders from other parties, it does stand a good possibility to win more seats. Jagan, as we all know is a ‘master mind’ and even though the allegations of corruption are on him, people are more inclined to what he might be doing if elected to power. Youth and women are his backbone. Jagan immensely laid the foundation for “connect to masses” factor and as a matter of fact is successful too. TDP: CBN is a shrewd and composed administrator and politician. He precisely knows there are 2 more years for election and any momentum he generates now would be waste of time and energy as people would forget in the long run, which he might have learned from his own 9 years in power. The long term strategy he seems to employ is, announcement of 70+ candidates way before the 2014 elections and also the 100 seat reservation for BC’s. There is a good possibility that TDP might announce a pro Telangana stand with Hyderabad being common capital. If Naidu can make his flock of leaders stick to him for the next 1.5-2 years he actually has a good chance of winning seats. The main factors that would help TDP are anti incumbency factor of Congress and “ticket aspiring” leaders in YSR. Of course TDP has more dents from TRS and Lok Satta as the traditional TDP vote is being divided by these two parties in Telangana and urban areas. TRS: From the present state of circumstances, TRS holds very well in Telangana region as the people are now convinced only TRS is the party with potential to make the likelihood of Telangana state a possibility. Out of the 120+ seats TRS has very bright prospects of securing the seats. Unless TDP comes up with pro Telangana stand and unless BJP gathers momentum at the grass roots, TRS seems to be unprecedented. BJP: Lost pretty much the cadre in Coastal Andhra and Rayalaseema. Party is betting mostly on Telangana plank. The recent Mahabubnagar re-election win almost made it look like the only party in Telangana that would challenge TRS supremacy. Even the most recent statements from National leaders about Telangana being the prominent issue once voted to power seems like a long term strategy in securing as much seats as possible. Pro Hindutva image might hurt due in some Muslim dominated areas of Telangana, which would actually marginalize people and AIMIM might contest the same seats in those areas to branch out of Hyderabad. AIMIM: Because of its stand on anti Telangana, it might actually find supporters in and around Greater Hyderabad other than its core voter base. Might expand the numbers from 7 in present assembly. Lok Satta: “All is Well”, seems like all is well but no one knows how to make people understand it. Ask anyone about Lok Satta Party, most of them would answer it’s a great party and “I Like it’s ideology”, but ask the same person would you vote for it, the answer might not be as favorable!! It might increase the vote “share” from 2009 elections but due to lack of charismatic leaders other than JP, the connect with ‘aam jaanta’ might be difficult. That said, these are personal opinions and observations. No inclination towards any party or person. Sincerely Suresh Matta USA

Anna Hazare: Anti Corruption and..?

Anna Hazare: Anti Corruption and..?

What an overwhelming response to the Jan Lokpal Bill (anti corruption) movement/ satyagraha by mighty soul Anna Hazare. My head bows down with outmost respect for Anna Hazare for awakening million spirits to stand as one against corruption. One thing government did is to accept Anna’s proposal’s for Lokpal bill. Seems like Government did go to a panic mode once they realized how the whole movement spread like wildfire. I seriously doubt the integrity of present government in really accepting the proposals of Aann Hazare in the long run.

Corruption: Who is the culprit
Everyone in India, as we know, makes a fashion statement that almost all of our politicians are corrupt and the system is corrupted. The point I am trying to make here is who are these politicians? What makes a system? Who made them so called representatives to Assembly or Parliament? It is us PEOPLE.
When we as PEOPLE, misuse the power of VOTE and cast it on the basis of caste, creed, religion, money…we as people are nurturing this parasite called ‘corrupted politicians’. Why dig a hole (knowingly), fall into it and complain. Almost 40% of middle class and upper middle class people in India don’t even participate in voting. But the same people raise there voices against these so called ‘corrupted politicians’. Many a people say that we are forced to choose the best candidate among the two worst candidates contesting.

Possible Solution:
Let’s say we have an option of “No one to elect” on ballot paper and if the majority votes in a constituency are polled to this option of “No one to elect”, at least PEOPLE will have a voice to say that they are not interested in the contesting candidates. Now in this case, if there is no representative for the constituency, let the representative be Governor of the State for these “no one to elect” constituencies.
The true meaning of democracy is “for the people, by the people, to the people” … Then why are we forced to have to set of only candidates on the ballot paper. If everyone has a right to say in a democracy, we as PEOPLE, has the right to say “no one to elect too”…
Last but not least, in India if a MLA/MP resigns (for whatever reasons they have) before their term ends they shouldn’t be able to contest at least for the next 5 or so years. It’s the taxpayer’s money that is used to conduct elections.

Not just politicians, every citizen should be accountable to the country. The vendors who don’t pay their taxes, doctors or lawyers (those who don’t pay taxes), should also be accountable for their ill gotten money. Government should not only amend or propose bills but should also have independent citizen committees (not under bureaucracy) to overlook the implementation process.

Once again, my deep respects to Anna Hazare for igniting the fire in million spirits to see “Our India” progress..

Jai Hind
Suresh Matta
chilldesi@gamil.com